Today’s Current Issues in Interaction session coordinator Paola urged the team members present today to engage more with the weekly tasks that she gives out.
Further to that, she complained about lack of attendance and cohesion amongst members in her sessions, she said such attitude will stunt classmates’ general progress, explaining the purpose of commitment and broader view learning to encompass complex domains
“How do you design a system that identifies problems, and then define the solutions”.
“Cognitive psychology is only limited to the individual.”
We started today quite abruptly; David already started presentation about his lead user innovation/ social networking / application/ Toolkit project. At the end, it was suggested that he can make today’s advice more useful by concentrating his effort towards narrowing down his idea to a more time realistic one.
Although I was meant to show some stuff on “service ecology”, also called map of relationships between stakeholders’ and the product/ service, plus persona’s. I was rather focused on generating more design ideas and visiting similar websites to the one I am working on. I eventually ended up showing a presentation on service design plan, project vision, who what and why design, and activity list. Andy and Bob gave examples of persona’s, and what is service ecology, they requested me to produce some flow of values and persona’s relevant to my project by next session.
In the afternoon meeting after the break, Dik-AR in architectural building developments- had a discussion on measurements, space, distance and the possibility of moving the camera around the cubes (building blocks) to capture a richer view of the area.
Madu had a talk relating to her drum sequencer, Andy told her that she must identify who, what and why’s of her design project.
Halil also got a feedback based on the presentation he showed the class. Furthermore, he also experienced some practical methods for collating and processing ideas for his AR game project.
